MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162124819 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2003.1206435

Fuzzy Associative Database for multiple planar object recognition

2003· article· en· W2162124819 on OpenAlexaff
Shahed Shahir, Xiang Chen, Majid Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFuzzy logicTable (database)Associative propertyObject (grammar)Construct (python library)Content-addressable memoryArtificial intelligenceData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionInformation retrievalMathematicsArtificial neural networkProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a comprehensive method for multiple planar object recognition is presented. For this purpose, a Fuzzy Associative Database (FAD) is developed. FAD consists of a Fuzzy Database (FD) and a Fuzzy Search Engine (FSE). FD holds the trained object information, as in human memory, and FSE performs as in brain, which processes incoming information based on information exists in memory, database. The FD includes two tables. The FSE uses table one to construct a Bank of Fuzzy Associative Memory Matrix (BFAMM) in order to conduct search over table two. In fact, the FSE establishes a correspondence between an object and one of the trained classes in table two of the FD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Automated SystemsFrench-language works237,207