Fair scheduling for real-time multimedia support in IEEE 802.16 wireless access networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Successful deployment of Broadband Wireless Access Networks such as WiMAX (IEEE 802.16) will be contingent on provisions for supporting multimedia traffic. In this paper, we review the quality of service features of access networks such as the 802.16 standard, and identify algorithms and schemes that are needed for supporting multimedia traffic in such networks. The 802.16 standard only specifies the features that should be implemented and leaves the design of a quality of service solution to developers. This includes the design of a mandatory scheduling framework. We present a comprehensive multimedia support framework based on the standard features. The framework specifies the architectures for the base station and the subscriber station, and contributes a number of algorithms for different service provisioning objectives. We use the concept of virtual packets to provide fair packet based centralized scheduling of uplink and downlink packets. The presented solution also provides algorithms for temporal and throughput fair scheduling in multirate physical layer of the 802.16 networks. An important part of the presented design is a multi-class fair scheduling scheme which is proposed for providing better delay performance for real time applications, while maintaining slightly longer term fairness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it