MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162127837 · doi:10.1109/qshine.2004.53

Uplink QoS-aware admission control in WCDMA networks with class-based power sharing

2004· article· en· W2162127837 on OpenAlexaff
Hossam S. Hassanein, Alex Oliver, Nidal Nasser, Ehab S. Elmallah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUMTS frequency bandsQuality of serviceComputer scienceTelecommunications linkComputer networkCall Admission ControlComponent (thermodynamics)Admission controlPower controlBlocking (statistics)Distributed computingPower (physics)Wireless networkWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient call admission control (CAC) techniques are of paramount importance in UMTS networks to satisfy the quality of service (QoS) requirements of different traffic classes and to utilize the system resources in an efficient manner. In this paper, we propose a novel uplink CAC framework to enhance existing UMTS networks on three related accounts. First, we introduce a measurement-based component to calculate the current load of the system; second, this measurement-based component is integrated with a power prediction module to estimate the load increment that the new call will bring into the system; and third, the proposed framework feeds the results obtained to a call admission control algorithm with a QoS-enforcing mechanism that gives each class of traffic different treatment based on the QoS requirement of the connections. To the best of our knowledge, ours is a first attempt towards combining the above components into one uplink CAC framework that aims to enhance system performance and to achieve per-class QoS objectives. Simulation results show that the framework is able to reduce dropping ratio for active users to zero level. Thus, it satisfies mobile users' needs resulting in stable performance levels during heavy load periods. Furthermore, the framework provides a low blocking ratio for new calls, which translates into high resource utilization. This is a highly desirable property from the service provider point of view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207