Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Years ago I published a book called Blooded Thought, the title of which came out of a line by the poet Wallace Stevens: ‘‘An abstraction blooded, as a man by thought.’’1 Actually, some of that blood rushed to the head when I was first directing Beckett’s plays – in San Francisco, more than half a century ago – and would often speak to the actors in a Beckettian way, my words inseparable from his words, as a way of thinking through or by means of what it is that he thought. I’ve written several essays in the past in which I thought thus, and there are passages here in which I’ll be doing the same. If, then, I sometimes indicate quotations and sometimes (or mostly)don’t – though I think you’ll know when he’s speaking – it’s because I’m trying to convey, in the moment, what he thought, as I think it. I should say that one of the things confirmed by Beckett every time I read him is that it’s precisely where thought escapes me, at the selvage or circuitous limit of thought, that it may, tautologically, turn back upon itself, which is what keeps it going, to be thought all over again – this time, to begin with, in even more personal terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it