Immediate Postoperative Care of the Heart Transplant Recipient: Perils and Triumphs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The early postoperative care of a heart transplant recipient remains challenging, even in experienced centers with a long tradition of excellence. Approximately 10% to 20% of heart transplant recipients experience potentially life-threatening right ventricular dysfunction intraoperatively and early postoperatively due to an elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. In addition, heart transplant recipients experience a high risk of perioperative hemorrhage, as well as opportunistic infection and rejection. The authors describe a case of severe right ventricular dysfunction in a 46-year-old male several hours after heart transplantation for a dilated cardiomyopathy. This patient was salvaged by judicious multimodality therapy including the use of adrenergic agents, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, inhaled nitric oxide, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The risk factors for the development of early graft failure after heart transplantation are reviewed, along with the principles of appropriate management of this complication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".