MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162139856 · doi:10.1002/ange.200300590

Jenseits thermodynamischer Acidität: der Komplex‐induzierte Näherungseffekt (CIPE) bei Deprotonierungen

2004· article· de· W2162139856 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2004
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldChemistry
TopicCoordination Chemistry and Organometallics
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Das Konzept des Komplex‐induzierten Näherungseffekts (complex induced proximity effect, CIPE) bei Deprotonierungen ist hilfreich bei der Aufklärung von Mechanismen in der Carbanionenchemie und bei der Planung organischer Synthesen. Im vorliegenden Aufsatz werden die Konsequenzen der Komplexierung von Organolithiumbasen an funktionellen Gruppen der Substrate vor dem Protonenübertragungsschritt diskutiert. Dabei zeigt sich, dass die experimentellen Daten aus kinetischen Messungen und Isotopenmarkierungsexperimenten ebenso wie die Ergebnisse von Rechnungen in vielen Fällen auf einen Prälithiierungskomplex als Reaktionsintermediat hinweisen. Einige Beispiele aus der Naturstoffsynthese verdeutlichen, wie mithilfe dieses Konzepts Zwischenstufen gezielt regio‐ oder stereoselektiv erhalten werden können. Von besonderem Interesse sind dabei Funktionalisierungen an Positionen, die von der koordinierenden Gruppe vermeintlich weit entfernt sind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it