MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measurement of the CO<sub>2</sub>apneic threshold in newborn infants: possible relevance for periodic breathing and apnea

2005· article· en· W2162209024 on OpenAlexafffund
Akram Khan, Mansour Qurashi, Kim Kwiatkowski, Don Cates, Henrique Rigatto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsApneaPeriodic breathingTorrVentilation (architecture)AnesthesiaBreathingBreathing gasRespiratory systemMedicineChemistryPhysicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measured the PCO2 apneic threshold in preterm and term infants. We hypothesized that, compared with adult subjects, the PCO2 apneic threshold in neonates is very close to the eupneic PCO2, likely facilitating the appearance of periodic breathing and apnea. In contrast with adults, who need to be artificially hyperventilated to switch from regular to periodic breathing, neonates do this spontaneously. We therefore measured the apneic threshold as the average alveolar PCO2 (PaCO2) of the last three breaths of regular breathing preceding the first apnea of an epoch of periodic breathing. We also measured the PaCO2 of the first three breaths of regular breathing after the last apnea of the same periodic breathing epoch. In preterm infants, eupneic PaCO2 was 38.6 +/- 1.4 Torr, the preperiodic PaCO2 apneic threshold was 37.3 +/- 1.4 Torr, and the postperiodic PaCO2 was 37.2 +/- 1.4 Torr. In term infants, the eupneic PaCO2 was 39.7 +/- 1.1 Torr, the preperiodic PaCO2 apneic threshold was 38.7 +/- 1.0 Torr, and the postperiodic value was 37.9 +/- 1.2 Torr. This means that the PaCO2 apneic thresholds were 1.3 +/- 0.1 and 1.0 +/- 0.2 Torr below eupneic PaCO2 in preterm and term infants, respectively. The transition from eupneic PaCO2 to PaCO2 apneic threshold preceding periodic breathing was accompanied by a minor and nonsignificant increase in ventilation, primarily related to a slight increase in frequency. The findings suggest that neonates breathe very close to their PCO2 apneic threshold, the overall average eupneic PCO2 being only 1.15 +/- 0.2 Torr (0.95-1.79, 95% confidence interval) above the apneic threshold. This value is much lower than that reported for adult subjects (3.5 +/- 0.4 Torr). We speculate that this closeness of eupneic and apneic PCO2 thresholds confers great vulnerability to the respiratory control system in neonates, because minor oscillations in breathing may bring eupneic PCO2 below threshold, causing apnea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207