MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162283192 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0579

Conservation laws of inviscid non-isentropic compressible fluid flow in <i>n</i> &gt; 1 spatial dimensions

2010· article· en· W2162283192 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInviscid flowEnstrophyBarotropic fluidConservation lawVorticityPolytropic processConserved quantityNoether's theoremEuler equationsFluid dynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent work giving a classification of kinematic and vorticity conservation laws of compressible fluid flow with barotropic equations of state (where pressure is a function only of the fluid density) in n >1 spatial dimensions is extended to general non-isentropic equations of state in which the pressure is also a function of the dynamical entropy (per unit mass) of the fluid. Two main results are obtained. First, we find that, apart from the familiar conserved integrals for mass, momentum, energy, angular momentum, Galilean momentum and volumetric entropy, additional kinematic conserved integrals arise only for non-isentropic equations of state given by a generalized form of the well-known polytropic equation of state with dimension-dependent exponent γ =1+2/ n , such that the proportionality coefficient is an arbitrary function of the entropy (per unit mass). Second, we show that the only vorticity conserved integrals consist of a circulatory entropy (which vanishes precisely when the fluid flow is irrotational) in all even dimensions. In particular, the vorticity integrals for helicity in odd dimensions and enstrophy in even dimensions are found to be no longer conserved for any non-isentropic equation of state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207