MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162288083 · doi:10.1215/21562261-1503772

On the one-dimensional cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation below L2

2012· article· en· W2162288083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKyoto journal of mathematics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsNonlinear Schrödinger equationNLSNonlinear systemLine (geometry)Space (punctuation)Mathematical analysisPoint (geometry)Cubic functionReal lineMathematical physicsSchrödinger equationGeometryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we review several recent results concerning well-posedness of the one-dimensional, cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLS) on the real line R and on the circle T for solutions below the L2-threshold. We point out common results for NLS on R and the so-called Wick-ordered NLS (WNLS) on T, suggesting that WNLS may be an appropriate model for the study of solutions below L2(T). In particular, in contrast with a recent result of Molinet, who proved that the solution map for the periodic cubic NLS equation is not weakly continuous from L2(T) to the space of distributions, we show that this is not the case for WNLS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it