Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Impaired Control over Substance Use
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the proceedings of a symposium held at the June 2005 meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism in Santa Barbara, California. Impaired control over substance use has long been considered a central feature of alcohol and drug dependence. However, much remains to be learned about the nature of impaired control, the mechanisms by which acute and chronic substance use can lead to impaired control, and how this construct is best assessed in the laboratory and the clinic. The goal of this symposium was to describe current perspectives on impaired control over alcohol and drug use from diverse research areas, to promote future multidisciplinary work in this area. Four speakers described their work on impaired control using human clinical samples (Dr. Chung), animal models (Dr. Miczek), experimental laboratory paradigms in humans (Dr. Fillmore), and neuroimaging studies (Dr. Easdon). Taken together, the talks highlighted the heterogeneous nature of constructs such as impaired inhibitory control, and patterns of impulsive and compulsive substance use. Future clinical and experimental research should attempt to carefully define and measure particular aspects of impaired control and to seek insights from other disciplines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".