MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162323386 · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/17/5/017

Exact semi-geostrophic flows in an elliptical ocean basin

2004· article· en· W2162323386 on OpenAlexaff
Robert J. McCann, Adam M. Oberman

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsGeostrophic windVorticityMathematical analysisStream functionPotential vorticityClassical mechanicsGeophysical fluid dynamicsGeometryPhysicsMechanicsVortex

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new family of exact solutions is analysed, which models two-dimensional circulations of an ideal fluid in a uniformly rotating elliptical tank, under the semi-geostrophic approximation from meteorology and oceanography. The fluid pressure and stream function remain quadratic functions of space at each instant in time, and their fluctuations are described by a single degree of freedom Hamiltonian system depending on two conserved parameters: domain eccentricity and the constant value of potential vorticity. These parameters determine the presence or absence of periodic orbits with arbitrarily long periods, fixed points of the dynamics, and aperiodic homoclinic orbits linking hyperbolic saddle points. The energy relative to these parameters selects the frequency and direction in which isobars nutate or precess, as well as the steady circulation direction of the fluctuating flow. The canonically conjugate variables are the moment of inertia and angle of inclination of an elliptical inverse-potential-vorticity patch evolving in dual coordinates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNonlinearitySame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207