A stochastic method for Bayesian estimation of hidden Markov random field models with application to a color model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a new stochastic algorithm for computing useful Bayesian estimators of hidden Markov random field (HMRF) models that we call exploration/selection/estimation (ESE) procedure. The algorithm is based on an optimization algorithm of O. François, called the exploration/selection (E/S) algorithm. The novelty consists of using the a posteriori distribution of the HMRF, as exploration distribution in the E/S algorithm. The ESE procedure computes the estimation of the likelihood parameters and the optimal number of region classes, according to global constraints, as well as the segmentation of the image. In our formulation, the total number of region classes is fixed, but classes are allowed or disallowed dynamically. This framework replaces the mechanism of the split-and-merge of regions that can be used in the context of image segmentation. The procedure is applied to the estimation of a HMRF color model for images, whose likelihood is based on multivariate distributions, with each component following a Beta distribution. Meanwhile, a method for computing the maximum likelihood estimators of Beta distributions is presented. Experimental results performed on 100 natural images are reported. We also include a proof of convergence of the E/S algorithm in the case of nonsymmetric exploration graphs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".