MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162351861 · doi:10.1109/tnano.2010.2041466

Ion Channel Biosensors—Part II: Dynamic Modeling, Analysis, and Statistical Signal Processing

2010· article· en· W2162351861 on OpenAlexaff
Vikram Krishnamurthy, Sahar Moradi Monfared, Bruce Cornell

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
Topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalyteBiosensorBiological systemSignal processingNonlinear systemPartial differential equationMolecular biophysicsComputer scienceChemistryPhysicsMaterials scienceMathematicsNanotechnologyChromatographyMathematical analysisTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the dynamic modeling, analysis, and statistical signal processing of the ion channel switch biosensor. The electrical dynamics are described by a second-order linear system. The chemical kinetics of the biosensor response to analyte concentration in the reaction-rate-limited regime are modeled by a two-timescale nonlinear system of differential equations. Also, the analyte concentration in the mass-transport-influenced regime is modeled by a partial differential equation subject to a mixture of Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions. By using the theory of singular perturbation, we analyze the model so as to predict the performance of the biosensor in transient and steady-state regimes. Finally, we outline the use of statistical signal processing algorithms that exploit the biosensor dynamics to classify analyte concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on NanotechnologySame topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcationFrench-language works237,207