MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162365431

Stereo disparity measurement for binocular stereo video systems

2009· article· en· W2162365431 on OpenAlexaff
Kunio Takaya

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 ICCAS-SICE · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSubpixel renderingComputer scienceRGB color modelComputer stereo visionRaster graphicsStereopsisPixelComputer graphics (images)Line (geometry)Position (finance)Scan lineStereo camerasGrayscaleMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports the development of a stereo disparity measurement system by the binocular video camera. The system uses a simple optical configuration such that raster lines of the right and left cameras share the same vertical position. This allows 1D search along the raster scan line to match local patterns in the RGB color space. In order to deal with the occlusion, a strategy to minimize the number of line crossings among the lines connecting the pixel points in the right and left raster lines. Small disparity for a large distance to the object necessitates subpixel stereo matching. A method based on the phase-only cross correlation was incorporated. The system was developed for the Windows platform using Visual C++ and videoOCX library. The system is capable of displaying dense disparity maps continuously at a lower video rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2009 ICCAS-SICESame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207