MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162365630 · doi:10.1242/jeb.02781

Tribute to P. L. Lutz: a message from the heart – why hypoxic bradycardia in fishes?

2007· review· en· W2162365630 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony P. Farrell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBradycardiaHeart rateReflex bradycardiaInternal medicineCardiac outputHypoxia (environmental)CardiologyReflexAnesthesiaMedicineBlood pressureOxygenChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sensing and processing of hypoxic signals, the responses to these signals and the modulation of these responses by other physical and physiological factors are an immense topic filled with numerous novel and exciting discoveries. Nestled among these discoveries, and in contrast to mammals, is the unusual cardiac response of many fish to environmental hypoxia - a reflex slowing of heart rate. The afferent and efferent arms of this reflex have been characterised, but the benefits of the hypoxic bradycardia remain enigmatic since equivocal results have emerged from experiments examining the benefit to oxygen transfer across the gills. The main thesis developed here is that hypoxic bradycardia could afford a number of direct benefits to the fish heart, largely because the oxygen supply to the spongy myocardium is precarious (i.e. it is determined primarily by the partial pressure of oxygen in venous blood, Pv(O(2))) and, secondarily, because the fish heart has an unusual ability to produce large increases in cardiac stroke volume (V(SH)) that allow cardiac output to be maintained during hypoxic bradycardia. Among the putative benefits of hypoxic bradycardia is an increase in the diastolic residence time of blood in the lumen of the heart, which offers an advantage of increased time for diffusion, and improved cardiac contractility through the negative force-frequency effect. The increase in V(SH) will stretch the cardiac chambers, potentially reducing the diffusion distance for oxygen. Hypoxic bradycardia could also reduce cardiac oxygen demand by reducing cardiac dP/dt and cardiac power output, something that could be masked at cold temperature because of a reduced myocardial work load. While the presence of a coronary circulation in certain fishes decreases the reliance of the heart on Pv(O(2)), hypoxic bradycardia could still benefit oxygen delivery via an extended diastolic period during which peak coronary blood flow occurs. The notable absence of hypoxic bradycardia among fishes that breathe air during aquatic hypoxia and thereby raise their Pv(O(2)), opens the possibility that that the evolutionary loss of hypoxic bradycardia may have coincided with some forms of air breathing in fishes. Experiments are needed to test some of these possibilities. Ultimately, any potential benefit of hypoxic bradycardia must be placed in the proper context of myocardial oxygen supply and demand, and must consider the ability of the fish heart to support its routine cardiac power output through glycolysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207