MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162387787 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.01.014

Actin filament associated protein mediates c-Src related SRE/AP-1 transcriptional activation

2011· article· en· W2162387787 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Bing Han, Helan Xiao, Jing Xu, Monika Lodyga, Tianru Jin, Mingyao Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCancer Research Institute
KeywordsTransactivationProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcCell biologySH3 domainSignal transducing adaptor proteinCytoskeletonActinChemistryMolecular biologyBiologySignal transductionTranscription factorBiochemistryGeneCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AFAP is an adaptor protein involved in cytoskeletal organization and intracellular signaling. AFAP binds and activates c-Src; however, the downstream signals of this interaction remain unknown. Here we show that co-expression of AFAP and c-Src induce transcriptional activation of SRE and AP-1 in a c-Src activity dependent fashion. Structural-functional studies suggest that the proline-rich motif in the N-terminus of AFAP is critical for c-Src activation, and subsequent SRE/AP-1 transactivation and the actin-binding domain in the AFAP C-terminus is negatively involved in the regulation of AFAP/c-Src mediated SRE/AP-1 transactivation. Selective deletion of this domain enhances transactivation of SRE. We conclude that in addition to its role in the regulation of cytoskeletal structures, AFAP may also be involved in the c-Src related transcriptional activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207