MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162399985 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014598

Small-scale structure in the Rosette molecular cloud revealed by <i>Herschel</i>

2010· article· en· W2162399985 on OpenAlexafffund
James Di Francesco, Sarah Sadavoy, F. Motte, N. Schneider, M. Hennemann, T. Csengeri, S. Bontemps, Z. Balog, A. Zavagno, Ph. André, P. Saraceno, Matt Griffin, A. Men’shchikov, A. Abergel, J. P. Baluteau, J.-P. Bernard, P. Cox, L. Deharveng, P. Didelon, A. M. Di Giorgio, Peter Hargrave, M. Huang, J. M. Kirk, S. J. Leeks, J. Z. Li, A. P. Marston, P. G. Martin, V. Minier, S. Molinari, G. Olofsson, P. Persi, S. Pezzuto, D. Russeil, M. Sauvage, B. Sibthorpe, L. Spinoglio, L. Testi, D. Teyssier, R. Vavrek, D. Ward–Thompson, G. J. White, C. D. Wilson, A. Woodcraft

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of VictoriaMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCentro de Instrumentación Científico-Técnica, Universidad de JaénCanadian Space AgencyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesBundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und TechnologieCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCalifornia Institute of TechnologyImperial College LondonMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieCardiff University
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsMolecular cloudSpire (mollusc)Space observatoryStarsHigh massYoung stellar objectRosette (schizont appearance)ObservatoryStar formationAstronomyInfraredBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a preliminary analysis of the small-scale structure found in new 70-520 μm continuum maps of the Rosette molecular cloud (RMC), obtained with the SPIRE and PACS instruments of the Herschel Space Observatory. We find 473 clumps within the RMC using a new structure identification algorithm, with sizes up to ~1.0 pc in diameter. A comparison with recent Spitzer maps reveals that 371 clumps are “starless” (without an associated young stellar object), while 102 are “protostellar.” Using the respective values of dust temperature, we determine the clumps have masses (MC) over the range -0.75 ≤ log (MC/) ≤ 2.50. Linear fits to the high-mass tails of the resulting clump mass spectra (CMS) have slopes that are consistent with those found for high-mass clumps identified in CO emission by other groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207