EFFECT OF CHEMICAL INHIBITORS AND STORAGE TEMPERATURE ON THE QUALITY OF FRESH‐CUT POTATOES1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fresh‐cut potato strips were dipped in 1% N‐acetyl‐L‐cysteine (NALC), 1% diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and 5% erythorbic acid ‐ 1% citric acid (EACA) prior to storage under modified atmosphere at 1 and 6C. Color changes over a 21 day storage period were assessed by tristimulus colorimetry; microbial changes (total aerobic populations, lactic acid bacteria, yeast and mold) by standard microbiological methods; and color, texture, exudation, off odor and integrated quality assessment by a six‐member sensory panel. All chemical treatments delayed color changes, microbial growth and sensory alterations in the stored potatoes. However, dipping in EACA was the only treatment that yielded product that compared favorably with freshly prepared potatoes after 14 days at 1C or 7 days at 6C. The effectiveness of all the treatments was strongly affected by storage temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".