MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162424587 · doi:10.1109/isspit.2005.1577151

Projection-based adaptive Am-FM chirp components signal decomposition

2006· article· en· W2162424587 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Rashidi Far, Saeed Gazor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChirpAlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Subspace topologyInstantaneous phaseFrequency modulationProjection (relational algebra)MathematicsRate of convergenceAmplitudeAdditive white Gaussian noiseComputer scienceWhite noiseControl theory (sociology)StatisticsTelecommunicationsRadarPhysicsRadio frequencyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the maximum windowed likelihood cost function is utilized to decompose a signal into AM-FM chirp components in presence of the white Gaussian noise. First, the MWL function is deployed in amplitude estimation assuming the frequencies are approximately known. This is equivalent to the projection of the input signal to the signature subspace of the signal. In the frequency and the frequency change rate tracking using this optimum amplitude as a function of the frequency and the frequency change rate, the cost function is optimized. This leads to minimizing the orthogonal projection of the input vector onto the estimated signature subspace of the input signal. A gradient descent adaptive algorithm is deployed to track the frequency and the frequency change rate. Simulations are conducted for both single and two component signals to study the performance of the algorithm. Comparing the results with a similar algorithm, when the estimated amplitude is not considered as a function of the frequency and the frequency change rate in the optimization process of the frequency and the frequency change rate, suggests a faster convergence and a more accurate performance in tracking the crossing frequencies by the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207