MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162435641

Sobre la gramaticalización (im)posible de pendiente como preposición

2014· article· es· W2162435641 on OpenAlexaff
Enrique Pato

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticipleHumanitiesGrammaticalizationPhilosophyLinguisticsVerb
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los trabajos sobre gramaticalización se han centrado en procesos ya consumados. En este trabajo se intentará mostrar por qué motivos el participio pendiente no ha podido, y no puede, desarrollarse como elemento prepositivo, al contrario de lo que ha sucedido en otras lenguas romances como el francés. Para ello, revisaremos la variación que ha mantenido con otros competidores que podrían haber impedido su recategorización.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicSpanish Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207