MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Passively mode-locked thin disk lasers reach 10 microjoules pulse energy at megahertz repetition rate and drive high field physics experiments

2007· article· en· W2162484753 on OpenAlexaff
S. V. Marchese, Shigeki Hashimoto, C. R. E. Baer, Michael Ruosch, Rachel Grange, M. Golling, Thomas Südmeyer, U. Keller, Guylaine Lépine, G Gingras, B. Witzel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaserThin diskOpticsPulse durationPhysicsDiodeDisk laserFull width at half maximumLaser beam qualityMaterials scienceLaser power scalingSemiconductor laser theoryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The direct generation of high energy pulses with a diode-pumped solid-state laser oscillator is a promising approach to enable the multi-megahertz operation of numerous applications in science and industry. Thin disk lasers enable the required average power with excellent beam quality, such that passive mode locking with a semiconductor saturable absorber mirror (SESAM) can be achieved. Using this concept, the authors have recently been able to reach a pulse energy as high as 5.1 muJ at 12 MHz repetition rate from an Yb:YAG thin disk oscillator. This significant increase over previous results was made possible by realizing the importance of the nonlinearity of air inside a thin disk laser cavity. To eliminate the air's contribution to the nonlinearity, the laser was covered with a box which then was flooded with helium. Here a further increase in pulse energy to 11 muJ is presented. The existing 40.7 MHz laser cavity presented was extended to a total of 37 m, by inserting a 23.4 m long multiple-pass cavity (MPC) and a simple 4f extension using curved mirrors with 5000 mm radius of curvature. This resulted in a repetition rate of 4 MHz, at which we achieved an average power of 45 W when operated in the box flooded with helium. The sech <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> -shaped pulses had a FWHM-duration of 791 fs and a spectral bandwidth of 1.56 nm, resulting in a time-bandwidth product of 0.35 (Fourier-limit: 0.315). The beam quality was nearly diffraction-limited with an M <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> -value of 1.1 (measured at 9.4 muJ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207