MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162489452 · doi:10.1142/s0219691305000853

ON COARSE QUANTIZATION OF TIGHT GABOR FRAME EXPANSIONS

2005· article· en· W2162489452 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Wavelets Multiresolution and Information Processing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantization (signal processing)MathematicsA priori and a posterioriTranslation (biology)Gabor waveletFrame (networking)Fourier transformMathematical analysisAlgorithmPure mathematicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceWavelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a coarse quantization algorithm (TFΣΔ-II) for tight Gabor frame expansions of certain functions in L 2 (ℝ), an alternative to the TFΣΔ of Ref. 11. By using some a priori information about the function to be quantized and compromising the translation invariance of the TFΣΔ, TFΣΔ-II produces an approximation in L 2 (ℝ), as opposed to the weak type approximations of TFΣΔ. In particular, for a tight Gabor frame with frame bound A, we prove that the L 2 -approximation error corresponding to a kth-order TFΣΔ-II quantizer is of order O(A -k ). Furthermore, motivated by TFΣΔ-II, we construct an algorithm to coarsely quantize the Fourier coefficients of certain compactly supported functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it