MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162513761 · doi:10.1145/1039813.1039817

BACOL

2004· article· en· W2162513761 on OpenAlexaff
R. Wang, P. Keast, Paul Muir

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputationSolverDiscretizationA priori and a posterioriSoftwareSpline (mechanical)AlgorithmFortranComputational scienceMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACOL is a new, high quality, robust software package in Fortran 77 for solving one-dimensional parabolic PDEs, which has been shown to be significantly more efficient than any other widely available software package of the same class (to our knowledge), especially for problems with solutions exhibiting rapid spatial variation. A novel feature of this package is that it employs high order, adaptive methods in both time and space, controlling and balancing both spatial and temporal error estimates. The software implements a spline collocation method at Gaussian points, with a B-spline basis, for the spatial discretization. The time integration is performed using a modification of the popular DAE solver, DASSL. Based on the computation of a second, higher order, global solution, a high quality a posteriori spatial error estimate is obtained after each successful time step. The spatial error is controlled by a sophisticated new mesh selection algorithm based on an equidistribution principle. In this article we describe the overall structure of the BACOL package, and in particular the modifications to the DASSL package that improve its performance within BACOL. An example is provided in the online Appendix to illustrate the use of the package.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1810.128

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Mathematical SoftwareSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207