MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162534832 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2009.5425995

Adaptive Lp-Norm Metric for Secondary BICM-OFDM Systems

2009· article· en· W2162534832 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Nasri, Robert Schober

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingDecoding methodsComputer scienceNorm (philosophy)Bit error rateRobustness (evolution)MathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequency bands used by secondary systems such as cognitive radio (CR) and ultra-wideband (UWB) systems are subject to various forms of non-Gaussian noise and interference including co-channel interference caused by the primary user and other secondary systems and man-made impulsive noise. For secondary systems employing the popular combination of bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM) and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) it has been recently shown that robustness against the negative effects of non-Gaussian impairments can be achieved by replacing the conventional L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> -norm metric for Viterbi decoding with an L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> - norm metric. However, in order to achieve high performance, the metric parameter p has to be optimized for the underlying type of noise. In this paper, we propose two adaptive algorithms for online optimization of p. The first algorithm is based on a maximum-likelihood parameter estimation framework. The second algorithm is based on the direct minimization of the asymptotic bit error rate of L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> -norm decoding. Simulation results show that both algorithms have excellent performance and that the resulting adaptive L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> -norm metric outperforms other popular metrics in non-Gaussian noise channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207