<b>J.K. Gibson-Graham, Stephen Resnick, and Richard D. Wolff,</b><b><i>Re/presenting Class: Essays in Post-Modern Marxism.</i></b> London: Duke University Press, 2001. 336 pp. $54.95 cloth; $18.95 paper.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Re/Presenting Class is a timely and evocative collection of essays devoted to exploring the contribution postmodern Marxist class theory can make to the contemporary study of political economy. This multifaceted exploration marks a refreshing departure from the conventional focus of the political economic tradition on classical Marxist analysis of the capitalist system as a total system or mode of production. On this conventional approach, class functions merely as an instrument of the dominant mode of capital accumulation. By contrast, the essays in Gibson-Graham, Resnick and Wolff's collection employ various forms of class analysis as an independent means to illuminate contemporary and historical political economies. Here class is understood not simply as an instrumentality of capitalist accumulation, but as a set of independent “processes of producing, appropriating and distributing surplus labor” (17, 169). In essence, the essays attempt, in various ways, to extricate class analysis from general “theory of the capitalist totality,” (1) and to examine what kinds of insight it can offer as an independent framework in its own right. In general, the project repays the investment just as the book rewards reading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it