MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162596336 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2001.980924

An optimization model for a company with constraints on risk control

2003· article· en· W2162596336 on OpenAlexaff
Tahir Choulli, Michael Taksar, Xun Yu Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDividend policyProfit (economics)Bellman equationDividendConstant (computer programming)Mathematical optimizationDynamic programmingPaymentOptimal controlStochastic controlControl (management)Computer scienceCorporationExpected utility hypothesisPresent valueEconomicsMicroeconomicsMathematical economicsFinanceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate a model of a corporation which faces constant liability payments and which can choose a production/business policy from an available set of control policies with different expected profits and risks. The objective is to maximize the expected present value of the total dividend distributions. The main purpose of this paper is to deal with the impact of constraints on business activities such as inability to completely eliminate risk (even at the expense of reducing the potential profit to zero) or when such a risk cannot exceed a certain level. We analyze the case in which there is no restriction on the dividend pay-out rates. By delicate analysis on the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation we compute explicitly the optimal return function and determine the optimal policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228)Same topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207