MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162624267 · doi:10.1159/000118743

Chromosome variation in the embryos of domestic animals

2008· review· en· W2162624267 on OpenAlexafffund
W.A. King

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetic and Genome Research · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBiologyEmbryoChromosomeSomatic cellGeneticsCytogeneticsEmbryo transferSomatic cell nuclear transferIn vitro fertilisationAndrologyEmbryogenesisBlastocystGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chromosome abnormalities in the embryos of domestic animals are mostly eliminated during development. De novo chromosome abnormalities in the embryos of domestic animals have been detected in a larger proportion of embryos produced by in vitro fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer than in those produced by natural mating or artificial insemination. The increased incidence of abnormalities in embryos produced in vitro provides evidence for an influence of the embryo production procedures on chromosome stability. Research strategies involving cytogenetics, molecular biology and reproductive biotechnologies hold the promise of yielding insight into the mechanisms underlying chromosome instability in embryos and the impact of the in vitro environment on the chromosome make-up of embryos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetic and Genome ResearchSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207