MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162636717 · doi:10.1109/pes.2011.6039487

Load sharing of autonomous distribution-level microgrids

2011· article· en· W2162636717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage droopMicrogridInterfacingInductanceControl theory (sociology)AC powerComputer sciencePower (physics)Resistive touchscreenElectrical impedanceInverterOutput impedanceVoltageControl (management)EngineeringVoltage sourceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the problem of appropriate load sharing in an autonomous distribution-level microgrid, where the considerable resistive component of the line impedance makes the conventional frequency and voltage droop controls impractical. To improve active and reactive power sharing, a power control strategy is proposed which contains a virtual inductor at the interfacing inverter output and a supplementary control loop around the conventional droop control of each DG converter. Specifically, the virtual inductance prevents the coupling between the real and reactive power control by introducing a predominantly inductive impedance, and the supplementary control loop stabilizes the system while using high droop gains which are needed for proper load sharing. The proposed control strategy is proven to ensure satisfactory load sharing while stabilizing the system for a range of operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207