Influence of Viscosity-interface Modifier Interactions on Performance and Processability of Rice Hull PE Composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Interface modifiers and viscosity modifiers are added to wood plastic composites to improve interfacial adhesion and processing rate respectively. However, because of the chemically reactive nature of interface modifiers and viscosity modifiers, there is a high possibility of interactions between them, influencing the mechanical properties and processabilty of the composites. To evaluate this point, interactions between three different interface modifiers and a viscosity modifier were investigated in this study. Concurrently, the effectiveness of three different interface modifiers in improving mechanical properties of the composites was also studied. The results indicated that there was a significant improvement in the tensile strength, flexural strength, flexural modulus and impact properties of the composites with all the three maleated polyethylene based coupling agents. Moreover, presence of an amide carboxylic acid based viscosity modifier along with a maleated polyolefin based interface modifier reduced the mechanical properties of the composites as compared with that of the composites having only maleated polyolefin based interface modifiers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".