MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162652559 · doi:10.1517/17425255.2012.680886

An update on the ability of St. John's wort to affect the metabolism of other drugs

2012· review· en· W2162652559 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roja Rahimi, Mohammad Abdollahı

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacologyHypericum perforatumHyperforinMedicineCYP2C19CYP2D6PharmacokineticsCYP3A4Drug interactionDrugCYP2C9PharmacogenomicsBioavailabilityCytochrome P450MetabolismInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Hypericum perforatum (HP), more commonly known as St. John's wort, is a popular medicinal herb used for the treatment of depression. HP affects the pharmacokinetics of many drugs by inducing cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes, such as CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and P-gp as their plasma concentrations show the effects of concomitant use of HP. For the purpose of this review, all electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane library were searched to identify in vitro, in vivo or human studies about the effects of HP on the metabolism of drugs. Data collected were published between 1966 and January 2012. EXPERT OPINION: There are a number of drugs whose metabolism is reduced by HP. The authors point out that metabolic interactions between HP and drugs are not always unfavorable and sometimes have benefits (e.g., reduction of irinotecan toxicity and increase in clopidogrel responsiveness). HP does not have a significant influence on the kinetics of drugs such as carbamazepine, ibuprofen and theophylline. The use of HP preparations is not recommended in people who are taking immunosuppressants or cardiovascular drugs. With other medications, it is recommended that practitioners should only use HP preparations with a low hyperforin content and under careful monitoring. It is also recommended that because of the reduction in the bioavailability of oral contraceptives administered concurrently with HP, women who use HP preparations should use additional preventive methods to avoid unintended pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & ToxicologySame topicNatural Compound Pharmacology StudiesFrench-language works237,207