Physically Inspired Neural Network Model for RF Power Amplifier Behavioral Modeling and Digital Predistortion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a novel two hidden layers artificial neural network (2HLANN) model is proposed to predict the dynamic nonlinear behavior of wideband RF power amplifiers (PAs). Starting with a generic low-pass equivalent circuit of the PA, several circuit transformations are applied in order to build an appropriate artificial neural network structure and improve the modeling accuracy. This approach culminates in the development of a real-valued and feed-forward 2HLANN-based model. The parameters (number of neurons, memory depth, etc.) of the proposed model and the back propagation learning algorithm (learning rate, momentum term, etc.) used for its training were carefully studied and thoughtfully chosen to ensure the generality of the constructed model. The validation of the proposed models in mimicking the behavior of a 250-W Doherty amplifier driven with a 20-MHz bandwidth signal is carried out in terms of its accuracy in predicting its output spectrum, dynamic AM/AM and AM/PM characteristics, and in minimizing the normalized mean square error. In addition, the linearization of the Doherty PA using the 2HLANN enabled attaining an output power of up to 46.5 dBm and an average efficiency of up to 40% coupled with an adjacent channel power ratio higher than 50 dBc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".