MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162721377 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2007.366870

Bayesian Unsupervised Signal Classification by Dirichlet Process Mixtures of Gaussian Processes

2007· article· en· W2162721377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirichlet processCluster analysisMixture modelDirichlet distributionPattern recognition (psychology)Hierarchical Dirichlet processComputer scienceA priori and a posterioriGibbs samplingBayesian probabilityMarkov chain Monte CarloGaussian processAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceGaussianMathematicsLatent Dirichlet allocationTopic modelPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a Bayesian technique aimed at classifying signals without prior training (clustering). The approach consists of modelling the observed signals, known only through a finite set of samples corrupted by noise, as Gaussian processes. As in many other Bayesian clustering approaches, the clusters are defined thanks to a mixture model. In order to estimate the number of clusters, we assume a priori a countably infinite number of clusters, thanks to a Dirichlet process model over the Gaussian processes parameters. Computations are performed thanks to a dedicated Monte Carlo Markov Chain algorithm, and results involving real signals (mRNA expression profiles) are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207