MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Study of the Obstacle and Strategy for China Electric Power New Energy’s Developing

2010· article· en· W2162767784 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuanying Chi, Shaojie Zhang, Jingwen Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesObstacleRenewable energyWelfare economicsEngineeringPhilosophyEconomicsLawElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our government has prospectively realized the strategic sense for developing the renewable energy source ,and released some necessary laws and regulations promulgated one after another, As the future energy development direction, the renewable energy source still have some insufficiencies in the initial development period, they are eager for quick success and instant benefits, so some forceful measures should be taken to urge the its development orderly and rationalized. This article conducts the preliminary research for the new energy development problem, and further proposed the corresponding countermeasures, thus to provide certain references for our national developmental strategy further study. Keyword: New renewable energy sources (new energy), wind power, obstacles and countermeasures Resume: Le gouvernement chinois a apercu la signification strategique du developpement des energies renouvelables, ou des nouvelles energiesautrement dit, et a fait des lois et regles correspondantes. Pourtant, en tant que la perspective du developpement des energies, les energies renouvelables ont connu des problemes dans la premiere phase du developpement. Il existe des phenomenes d’agir avec trop de precipitation ou de developper dans un desordre. Nous devons du coup prendre des mesures efficaces pour. Pousser l’industrie electrique a se developper d’une facon bien ordonnee et progressivement. Cet article fait des recherches preliminaires sur les problemes existants dans le developpment de nouvelles energies et nous propose des solutions. Il est d’une valeur referentielle. Mots-cles: energies renouvelables (nouvelles energies), electricite eolienne, problemes et solutions 摘要: 我國政府已前瞻性地認識到發展可再生能源即新能源的戰略意義,並出臺了一些配套法規,但是可再生能源作為未來的能源發展方向,在發展初期仍存在很多不足,存在急功近利、無序發展的現象,因此我們需要採取有力的措施敦促電力行業有序發展。本文則對發展新能源存在的問題進行了初步性研究,並進一步提出相應對策,從而為進一步研究中國電力新能源的發展戰略提供一定的參考價值。 關鍵詞: 可再生能源(新能源);風電;問題與對策

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207