MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162779423 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1989.64143

A neural network implementation of an input access scheme in a high-speed packet switch

2003· article· en· W2162779423 on OpenAlexaff
M. Mehmet Ali, H.T. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkComputer networkNetwork packetIntegrated Services Digital NetworkThroughputPacket switchingAsynchronous Transfer ModeLAN switchingQueueFast packet switchingBurst switchingAlgorithmReal-time computingProcessing delayTransmission delayTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A neural network implementation of an input access scheme in a high-speed packet switch for broadband ISDN (integrated services digital network) is presented. In this switch, each input maintains a separate queue for each output; thus, in an (n*n) switch there will be n/sup 2/ input queues. Using synchronous operation, at most one packet per input and output will be transferred at every slot. A neural network maximizing the throughput of this switch is determined, and the form of the energy function, its optimized parameters, and the connection matrix are given. Simulations with random inputs have yielded results close to optimal throughput. This neural network can be implemented with the existing technology for medium switching sizes.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207