MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162787090

THE CAPE VERDEAN SLUM AREAS IN PORTUGAL, INTEGRATION OR SEGREGATION? HOW DOES THE SCHOOL PREPARE THE YOUNG CAPE VERDEAN IMMIGRANT GENERATION TO INTEGRATION IN THE PORTUGUESE SOCIETY?

2014· article· en· W2162787090 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martha Lea

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJ · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImmigration and Intercultural Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCape verdeImmigrationCapePortugueseSlumIdentity (music)SociologyGeographyPolitical scienceEthnologyArchaeologyArtDemographyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children do not ask for immigration. Tests show that immigrant students do less well than native students at school. Have their future possibilities become worse, while their parents wanted to get better conditions? How does school enhance their capacity to be equalised with native co-students? According to a Canadian professor, Jim Cummins, the way to go is to respect their mother tongue, their cultural identity and values and build upon this as a fundament for further education in cooperation with their parents and in an open communication between teachers and students .Is this the way to go to give the immigrant Cape Verde youth in the slum areas in Lisbon a starting point for a better future?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJSame topicImmigration and Intercultural EducationFrench-language works237,207