MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162790870 · doi:10.1109/caia.1992.200006

Pitch Expert-an engineered collection of specialized knowledge structures

2003· article· en· W2162790870 on OpenAlexaff
Allan Kowalski, Daniel Gauvin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of Montréal
FundersUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo
KeywordsExpert systemComputer sciencePulp (tooth)Pulp millKraft processMillDomain knowledgeKnowledge engineeringSet (abstract data type)Kraft paperArtificial intelligenceEngineeringPulp and paper industryMechanical engineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An expert system is described which diagnoses pitch related production problems in the kraft type of pulp mill. Pitch is a sticky material which forms deposits in pulp mills. Pitch Expert, a knowledge-based trouble shooter for pitch problems, operates under a heavy set of constraints imposed by the combination of the expertise itself and the operating environment of pulp mills. To satisfy these constraints, specialized structures and mechanisms were developed and refined to achieve a custom fit. These structures and constraints aid in the maintenance and continued addition of new knowledge to the systems. The utilization of this approach has led to a knowledge-based system with which both the domain expert and the end-users feel comfortable. The result is that the number of mills using this system is growing rapidly.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningFrench-language works237,207