MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162794728 · doi:10.7202/026106ar

Le secret et l’enfant victime de maltraitance sexuelle

2007· article· fr· W2162794728 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Martine de Lajudie

Bibliographic record

VenueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual abuseHumanitiesPsychologyArtPoison controlMedicineSuicide prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article met en évidence la mutiplicité des raisons qui poussent un enfant à garder le silence sur sa victimisation sexuelle. Trois catégories de facteurs ont été identifiées. La première se rapporte au stade de développement de l'enfant. La seconde concerne l'agresseur sexuel et les épisodes de maltraitance sexuelle. La troisième relève des caractéristiques du milieu de soutien de l'enfant et de la façon dont elles sont perçues par ce dernier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaireSame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207