Les malformations congénitales de la valve tricuspide chez les carnivores domestiques: étude rétrospective de 50 cas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A retrospective study was done on 14 cats and 36 dogs diagnosed with right atrioventricular valve malformations (RAVM), either tricuspid dysplasia (n = 38) or Ebstein's anomaly (n = 12). Comparison with a large reference population including 85 250 animals allowed an epidemiologic analysis of these RAVM, demonstrating that Labrador, Boxer and Chartreux cats had a 35, 7 and 11-fold higher risk respectively to be affected by one of these heart diseases than other breeds, without sexual predisposition. In 93% of cases, cardiac auscultation revealed a heart murmur, whose grade was not significantly correlated with the echographic stages of the valvular disease. The echocardiographic examination confirmed the frequent association between RAVM and other congenital anomalies, particularly mitral dysplasia, in 84% and 20% of tricuspid dysplasia and Ebstein anomaly respectively. Last, the prognosis of RAVM was worsened by atrial fibrillation and right-sided heart failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".