Les productions sonores de l’écouteur du récit : coopération ou subversion?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tout récit oral est jalonné de signes sonores émanant de celui qui écoute. L’analyse de deux récits a permis de dégager une typologie de ces signes ( mm , ah bon , syntagmes qualifiants, etc.) ainsi que les conditions de leur production, liées aux propriétés intonatives du discours du narrateur. L’examen des propriétés intonatives des interventions de l’écouteur et des réactions qu’elles suscitent chez le narrateur a également permis de préciser le statut énonciatif de l’écouteur. Si ses productions sonores sont en intonation haute et montante (il marque qu’il abdique son identité d’énonciateur pour prêter sa voix au narrateur), elles sont immédiatement intégrées au discours du narrateur, alors que si elles sont en intonation basse et peu modulée (il s’approprie alors la position d’énonciateur), elles produisent automatiquement une rupture dans la continuité narrative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".