MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162835436 · doi:10.1109/ciss.2006.286421

Rate Control and Dynamic Dimensioning of Multihop Wireless Networks

2006· article· en· W2162835436 on OpenAlexaff
Aditya Karnik, Ravi R. Mazumdar, Catherine Rosenberg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceWireless networkWireless WANWirelessDimensioningMunicipal wireless networkWi-Fi arrayHeterogeneous networkDistributed computingWireless distribution systemKey distribution in wireless sensor networksTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with the problem of allocation of data transfer rates to the elastic applications in a multihop wireless network. While this is a well understood problem in wired networks, wireless networks present substantially different dimension to it. For one the very concept of link capacity, though obvious for wired links, is not so for wireless links in a network. Moreover, unlike a wired network, the traffic capacity of a wireless network can be varied simply by modifying certain protocol parameters; thus it is possible to dimension the network dynamically. The wireless networks we consider are so-called infrastructure-based networks implying that they are deployed by service providers by creating hot-spots through access points whereas the end applications running on user devices act as the end users. This permits the network and the users to be seen as separate economic entities competing and collaborating in response to each other. The aim of this paper is to precisely understand these issues and address the appropriate formulations based on them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.001
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207