Vapochromic Behaviour of M[Au(CN)2]2-Based Coordination Polymers (M = Co, Ni)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of M[Au(CN)(2)](2)(analyte)(x) coordination polymers (M = Co, Ni; analyte = dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), pyridine; x = 2 or 4) was prepared and characterized. Addition of analyte vapours to solid M(μ-OH(2))[Au(CN)(2)](2) yielded visible vapochromic responses for M = Co but not M = Ni; the IR ν(CN) spectral region changed in every case. A single crystal structure of Zn[Au(CN)(2)](2)(DMSO)(2) revealed a corrugated 2-D layer structure with cis-DMSO units. Reacting a Ni(II) salt and K[Au(CN)(2)] in DMSO yielded the isostructural Ni[Au(CN)(2)](2)(DMSO)(2) product. Co[Au(CN)(2)](2)(DMSO)(2) and M[Au(CN)(2)](2)(DMF)(2) (M = Co, Ni) complexes have flat 2-D square-grid layer structures with trans-bound DMSO or DMF units; they are formed via vapour absorption by solid M(μ-OH(2))[Au(CN)(2)](2) and from DMSO or DMF solution synthesis. Co[Au(CN)(2)](2)(pyridine)(4) is generated via vapour absorption by Co(μ-OH(2))[Au(CN)(2)](2); the analogous Ni complex is synthesized by immersion of Ni(μ-OH(2))[Au(CN)(2)](2) in 4% aqueous pyridine. Similar immersion of Co(μ-OH(2))[Au(CN)(2)](2) yielded Co[Au(CN)(2)](2)(pyridine)(2), which has a flat 2-D square-grid structure with trans-pyridine units. Absorption of pyridine vapour by solid Ni(μ-OH(2))[Au(CN)(2)](2) was incomplete, generating a mixture of pyridine-bound complexes. Analyte-free Co[Au(CN)(2)](2) was prepared by dehydration of Co(μ-OH(2))[Au(CN)(2)](2) at 145 °C; it has a 3-D diamondoid-type structure and absorbs DMSO, DMF and pyridine to give the same materials as by vapour absorption from the hydrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".