Dose-response of RAG2-/-/γc-/- mice to busulfan in preparation for spermatogonial transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Practical applications of spermatogonial transplantation require good rates of colonization by the donor cells. Recipient testes are usually depleted of competing endogenous spermatogonia by administration of 32-44 mg busulfan kg(-1) body weight before transplantation. However, it is not clear that this is the optimum dose, especially for immunodeficient mice. In the present study, the response of adult RAG2(-/-)/gamma(c)(-/-) (RAG2) male mice to treatment with 10-50 mg busulfan kg(-1) body weight was determined in terms of mortality rates, testicular masses and histology, and colonization of seminiferous tubules by transplanted spermatogonia. Mortality increased from 0 to 50% at doses between 20 mg busulfan kg(-1) and 40 mg busulfan kg(-1), whereas the maximum effects on testicular mass and histology were observed at 20 mg busulfan kg(-1). Colonization of testes by genetically marked spermatogonia after treatment of mice with 20 mg busulfan kg(-1) was equivalent to rates previously reported in recipients treated with 32-44 mg busulfan kg(-1). Thus, 20 mg busulfan kg(-1) appears to be the optimum dose for preparing RAG2 mice for spermatogonial transplantation. However, because the steepness of the dose-response curves indicates that direct administration of busulfan is not ideal for this purpose, 15 mg busulfan kg(-1) was administered to pregnant females at various times between day 10.5 and day 16.5 of gestation to determine whether this would deplete the number of germ cells in male offspring. Although there were large variations in testicular mass and histology, no mortality was observed and administration of busulfan at day 10.5 or 12.5 after mating delayed initiation of spermatogenesis, indicating that prenatal administration of busulfan combined with neonatal transplantation might be an effective method for further increasing rates of colonization by donor spermatogonia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".