« Le train qui siffle ». Nostalgie et modernité dans la chanson country-western au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La chanson country-western, qui fait son apparition au Québec en 1942 avec les chansons de guerre de Roland Lebrun, a toujours exploité la nostalgie. Il s’agit d’un èthos fermement ancré dans ce répertoire et il est signalé, dans les enregistrements du country-western émergent des années 1940 et 1950, par plusieurs marqueurs sonores qui font notamment appel à un usage particulier du second mode de phonation et de la réverbération. Il s’agit alors d’une nostalgie typique de la modernité populaire, axée sur les souvenirs personnels et les récits individuels. Ce premier country-western s’inscrit par ailleurs dans la modernité de plusieurs manières, notamment par son succès médiatique. Cette modernité semble aujourd’hui complètement occultée et si la nostalgie demeure un élément clé de la chanson country-western, celle-ci est devenue une nostalgie plus traditionnelle et conservatrice, orientée vers une idéalisation du passé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".