MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162954344 · doi:10.1112/s0024611503014175

Local Classification of Conformally-Einstein Kähler Metrics in Higher Dimensions

2003· article· en· W2162954344 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the London Mathematical Society · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimension (graph theory)Metric (unit)Mathematics Subject ClassificationProduct metricEquivalence of metricsSubject (documents)Einstein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The requirement that a (non-Einstein) Kähler metric in any given complex dimension m > 2 be almost-everywhere conformally Einstein turns out to be much more restrictive, even locally, than in the case of complex surfaces. The local biholomorphic-isometry types of such metrics depend, for each m > 2, on three real parameters along with an arbitrary Kähler–Einstein metric h in complex dimension m − 1. We provide an explicit description of all these local-isometry types, for any given h. This result is derived from a more general local classification theorem for metrics admitting functions that we call special Kähler–Ricci potentials. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 53B35, 53B20, 53C25, 53C55.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it