Characterization of LRRFIP1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LRRFIP1 has been identified as a regulator of toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway signaling; however, little is known about its own regulation and function. This study was undertaken to characterize the biochemical properties and its regulation. Over-expression of full length LRRFIP1 led to enhanced responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We examined its expression in monocytic cell lines because they express a broad range of TLRs. We found that its level of expression was not altered by LPS or phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) but that it was up-regulated by nicotine, influenza infection, and serum starvation. Phosphorylation was examined because of the bioinformatically predicted serine phosphorylation sites. Serine phosphorylation was detected and was altered by both poly I:C and nicotine. Finally, we examined the regulation of intracellular localization in response to dsRNA and found that LRRFIP1 colocalized with labeled dsRNA in monocyte lysosomal structures but not with lysosomes lacking dsRNA. These data suggest that LRRFIP1 is phosphorylated in response to immunologic stimuli and it is directed to lysosomal structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".