MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162991481 · doi:10.1310/c8cq-ktb2-9qjx-c4gx

Neural Activity and Facilitated Recovery by Training After CNS Injury: Implications for Rehabilitation

2003· article· en· W2162991481 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah A. Dunlop, John D. Steeves

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair Discoveries
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationTraining (meteorology)Spinal cord injuryPhysical therapyNeuroscienceSpinal cordPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neural activity is vital for editing connections and ensuring useful function in the developing brain; such plasticity also continually shapes the intact adult brain. After injury, plasticity appears to be amplified. For example, the isolated spinal cord retains the capacity to learn and generate both simple and complex movements. After brain and spinal cord injury, appropriate neural activity that mimics normal behavioral patterns can drive plastic changes to produce some functional recovery. Specific training results in return of behaviors as diverse as olfaction, standing, walking, and cognitive processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207