Optical impulse modulation for indoor diffuse wireless communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current lasers and LEDs have far higher pulse rates than can be supported by the lowpass indoor diffuse optical wireless channel. Although high-frequency emissions are attenuated by the channel and are not detected by the receiver, a key insight of this paper is that these bands can be used to satisfy the channel non-negativity constraint. We define optical impulse modulation (OIM) in which data are confined to the lowpass region while the highpass region, which is attenuated by the channel, is used to satisfy the channel amplitude constraints. A mathematical framework for OIM is presented, and a simple suboptimal receiver filter is designed which is channel independent. Using a well-known exponential model for indoor diffuse optical channels, at a normalized delay spread of 0.2, the gain in optical average power of OIM with a simple lowpass receiver is shown to be 4.9 dBo which exceeds the gain of rectangular on-off keying (Rect-OOK) with a complex decision feedback equalizer. From an information theory point of view, at the same normalized delay spread of 0.2, the information rate of OIM with a lowpass receiver is shown to be 11.5% higher than that of Rect-OOK with a more complex whitened matched filter receiver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it