MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163112640 · doi:10.7202/1021296ar

La construction du lien social dans les romans d’Alain Mabanckou

2011· article· fr· W2163112640 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anthony Mangeon

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Université de Moncton · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forte de neuf fictions, l’oeuvre romanesque d’Alain Mabanckou présente à ce jour une grande cohérence. D’un roman à l’autre, le corps social semble se structurer suivant une logique relationnelle du redoublement systématique – lequel va du désir mimétique, installé au coeur des formes d’imitation et d’identification sociales, aux duplications et interférences entre monde humain et monde animal, voire entre « réalité » et « monde de l’invisible ». En explorant cette oeuvre romanesque qui fait du recoupement et du redoublement les forces majeures de sa cohérence, cet article met en relief la part qu’elle confère au mythe dans la construction du social, et par là même, donne à mieux comprendre la place déterminante qu’y joue la littérature dès qu’il s’agit, non plus simplement d’en interpréter, mais d’en recréer le sens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Université de MonctonSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207