Localization and Importance of the Adenovirus E4orf4 Protein during Lytic Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) E4orf4 product has been studied extensively although in most cases as expressed from vectors in the absence of other viral products. Thus, relatively little is known about its role in the context of an adenovirus infection. Although considerable earlier work had indicated that the E4orf4 protein is not essential for replication, a recent study using dl359, an Ad5 mutant believed to produce a nonfunctional E4orf4 protein, suggested that E4orf4 is essential for virus growth in primary small-airway epithelial cells (C. O'Shea, et al., EMBO J. 24:1211-1221, 2005). Hence, to examine further the role of E4orf4 during virus infection, we generated for the first time a set of E4orf4 virus mutants in a common Ad5 genetic background. Such mutant viruses included those that express E4orf4 proteins containing various individual point mutations, those defective entirely in E4orf4 expression, and a mutant expressing wild-type E4orf4 fused to the green fluorescent protein. E4orf4 protein was found to localize primarily in nuclear structures shown to be viral replication centers, in nucleoli, and in perinuclear bodies. Importantly, E4orf4 was shown not to be essential for virus growth in either human tumor or primary cells, at least in tissue culture. Unlike E4orf4-null virus, mutant dl359 appeared to exhibit a gain-of-function phenotype that impairs virus growth. The dl359 E4orf4 protein, which contains a large in-frame internal deletion, clustered in aggregates enriched in Hsp70 and proteasome components. In addition, the late viral mRNAs produced by dl359 accumulated abnormally in a nuclear punctate pattern. Altogether, our results indicate that E4orf4 protein is not essential for virus growth in culture and that expression of the dl359 E4orf4 product interferes with viral replication, presumably through interactions with structures in the nucleus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".