MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163173612 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2011.2134098

Online Parameter Optimization-Based Prediction for Converter Gas System by Parallel Strategies

2011· article· en· W2163173612 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersBaosteel Group Corporation
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linz Donawitz converter gas (LDG) is one of the most important sources of fuel energy in steel industry, whose reasonable use plays a crucial role in energy saving and environment protection. In practice, online prediction of variation of gas holder level and gas demand by users is fundamental to gas utilization and scheduling activities. In this study, a least square support vector machine-based prediction model combined with the parallel strategies is proposed, in which parameter optimization is realized online by a parallel particle swarm optimization and a parallelized validation method, both being implemented with the use of a graphic processing unit. The experiments demonstrate that the online parameter optimization based model greatly improves the prediction quality compared to the version with the fixed modeling parameters. Furthermore, the parallelized strategies largely reduce the computational cost thus guaranteeing the real-time effectiveness of the practical application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it